Tom Tromey writes: > >> It's been thought of, but nobody has tried implementing it. > >> Really you would be integrating this into g++, not gcj. > > Andrew> It would be much easier to do this in the gcj wrapper than in cc1plus. > > AIUI the idea is to eliminate gcjh, at least for CNI usage. I don't get it. How would this make the world a better place? Andrew.