Tue Mar 2 21:13:00 GMT 2004
>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <email@example.com> writes:
Per> I propose two new gcj options:
Per> The syntax for NAME matches that for JDK's java command:
Per> PACKAGE_NAME["..."] | CLASS_NAME
Per> If there is no "=NAME" the default applies to all classes.
There's already some machinery in gcj for something similar to this,
it is used for --assume-compiled. We could re-use that code for this
sort of thing as well, perhaps changing it to conform to the above
syntax. IMO there's a benefit to having a similar specification
approach for all per-class options.
Per> We should also also add support for enabling/disabling assertions
Per> in gij, though that is less urgent.
There's a PR for this already.
More information about the Java