libgcj and the NPTL posix threads implementation

[Anthony Green]

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 06:12, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Anthony Green writes:
>  > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 03:02, Andrew Haley wrote:
>  > > What happens with this test case if you use LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.3?
>  > 
>  > Segmentation fault.  Do you think this means we shouldn't use this?
> 
> Yes, I think it does.  We shouldn't crash with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.3.

I think we should push this problem over to Linux distro package
maintainers.  Isn't the right way to do this is to have a libgcj in
/usr/lib/tls and another in /usr/lib, just like libc?

gcc/libjava should once again configure and build outside of the GCC
tree for this to happen.  I think it's just a tweak or two away from
working.  Then an RPM spec file could build gcc with no libgcj, and then
build two libgcj's outside the tree.

AG

-- 
Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc.