RFC: stack trace generation

[Bryce McKinlay]

David Daney wrote:

>>Yeah, we are definitely going to do this. The only reason it wasn't done 
>>already time ago is due to the issues (PLT etc) that have been discussed 
>>already.
>>
>>    
>>
>Correct me if I am wrong, but arn't the PLT issues related to decoding
>the trace?  dwarf2-backtrace.cc only generates the trace so could be
>used today.
>  
>
You're right, the problem also exists with the current code. I'm going 
to work on getting the new code in soon.

Regards

Bryce