RFC: stack trace generation

[Bryce McKinlay]

Andrew Haley wrote:

> > Yes.  The dwarf2-backtrace.cc is probably mis-named as it uses the
> > functions that I believe you are referring to.
> > 
> > Being a very lazy person, I am only expending GCJ effort on the
> > platforms that I am currently paid to support (mipsel-linux*).  But
> > I have to wonder if it would not be a win to use
> > dwarf2-backtrace.cc with the i386-linux-gnu target and enable
> > -fomit-frame-pointer.
>
>It might.  I think that's what Bryce intended to do.
>
Yeah, we are definitely going to do this. The only reason it wasn't done 
already time ago is due to the issues (PLT etc) that have been discussed 
already.

Regards

Bryce