inter-class optimizations

[Andrew Haley]

Ranjit Mathew writes:
 > Andrew Haley wrote:
 > >  > This thread:
 > >  > 
 > >  > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-02/threads.html#01085
 > >  > 
 > >  > seems to conclude that we put in -fno-omit-frame-pointer
 > >  > anyways for libjava since we depend on backtrace( ), which
 > >  > in older libc-s (and on MinGW, BTW) uses the frame-pointer
 > >  > to walk the call frames.
 > > 
 > > That's right.  And whatever is the default for gcc as a whole, we can
 > > continue to relay on stack frames with a frame pointer until we're
 > > ready to switch.
 > 
 > ...which means changes to the GCJ spec file

Yes indeed.

Andrew.