New Jacks Failures! (Was: Re: [Patch] PR java/9685: Fix Catching Illegal Access to Package-Private Fields/Members)

[Ranjit Mathew]

Hi,

  I have since seen the same results on my home PC
(i686-pc-linux-gnu). Shall I update the jacks.xfail
file with the new realities or do we want to triage
the failures?

As I remarked before, it'll be really nice if someone
else can also independently verify these results - hey,
Jacks is pretty straightforward to run:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html#TOC2

and finishes quite soon on a modern PC.

Thanks,
Ranjit.


Ranjit Mathew wrote:
> Tom Tromey wrote:
> 
>>Ranjit> I am attaching a slightly revised version of my patch
>>Ranjit> incorporating Bryce's suggestions. 
>>
>>Ranjit> Ok for mainline?
>>
>>Could you also update the jacks xfail file at the same time?
>>The patch to do that is pre-approved, assuming that the 9685
>>patch is.  Thanks.
> 
> 
> Tom, I ran in-situ Jacks (i.e. Jacks within the
> "libjava/testsuite/libjava.jacks" folder) along with
> other libjava tests with an *unpatched* current mainline
> (as of 23-04-2004, IST) and I see that we seem to
> have 89(!) new FAILs and 3 XPASSes since your last
> update to jacks.xfail. The total number of Failures
> remained at 850, the same that I got yesterday.
> 
> Looks like we really, really need to enforce your
> suggestion of "No Jacks regressions for a front-end
> checkin!" rule. :-(
> 
> I'd really appreciate it if someone else can also
> confirm these new Jacks failures on the current mainline
> (I tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu) to rule out any SNAFUs
> on my part.
> 
> BTW, I used the patch in:
> 
>   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2004-q2/msg00206.html
> 
> to allow the tests to finish in a reasonable amount of
> time.
> 
> The full list of the new FAILs and XPASSes that I am
> seeing are as follows:
> --------------------------- 8< ---------------------------
> XPASS: 14.3-scope-11
> XPASS: 15.12.2.2-ambiguous-1
> XPASS: 15.12.2.2-ambiguous-2
> FAIL: 14.3-scope-10
> FAIL: 14.17-null-1
> FAIL: 14.17-null-3
> FAIL: 14.17-null-4
> FAIL: 14.17-null-5
> FAIL: 8.1.1.1-12
> FAIL: 8.1.2-enclosing-7
> FAIL: 8.1.2-enclosing-10
> FAIL: 8.5.2-non-static-member-usage-4
> FAIL: 8.5.2-non-static-member-usage-5
> FAIL: 8.4.6.2-hiding-5
> FAIL: 8.4.6.4-abstract-9
> FAIL: 16.1.7-compound-definite-unassignment-fail-7
> FAIL: 16.2.3-local-class-4
> FAIL: 16.2.3-local-class-5
> FAIL: 16.2.3-local-class-11
> FAIL: 16.2.8-unassigned-9
> FAIL: 16.2.8-unassigned-20
> FAIL: 16.2.8-unassigned-21
> FAIL: 16.2.8-unassigned-22
> FAIL: 16.2.8-unassigned-23
> FAIL: 15.21-type-25
> FAIL: 15.12.2.2-ambiguous-3
> FAIL: 15.12.2.2-ambiguous-17
> FAIL: 15.12.2.2-ambiguous-25
> FAIL: 15.12.2.2-ambiguous-27
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-1
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-2
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-3
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-4
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-5
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-9
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-10
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-11
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-12
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-13
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-14
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-15
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-16
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-17
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-class-19
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-method-1
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-method-2
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-method-3
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-method-4
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-method-5
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-method-7
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-method-9
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-method-10
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-method-11
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-method-12
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-constructor-1
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-constructor-2
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-constructor-3
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-constructor-4
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-constructor-5
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-constructor-7
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-constructor-9
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-constructor-10
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-constructor-11
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-constructor-12
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-constructor-13
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-constructor-14
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-field-1
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-field-2
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-field-3
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-field-4
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-field-5
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-field-7
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-field-9
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-field-10
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-field-11
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-field-12
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-field-13
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-lex-1
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-lex-2
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-lex-3
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-lex-4
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-lex-5
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-lex-6
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-lex-7
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-lex-8
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-lex-9
> FAIL: 4.7.10-jvms-lex-10
> FAIL: 13.4.8-constant-runtime-2
> FAIL: 13.1-runtime-method-5
> FAIL: 13.1-runtime-method-6
> FAIL: 15.18.1.1-runtime-5
> FAIL: non-jls-jsr41.3-runtime-2
> --------------------------- 8< ---------------------------
> 
> Thanks,
> Ranjit.
> 


-- 
Ranjit Mathew             Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com

Bangalore, INDIA.           Web: http://ranjitmathew.tripod.com/