gcj executable size reduction?

Ranjit Mathew rmathew@gmail.com
Fri Apr 16 05:21:00 GMT 2004

Boehm, Hans wrote:
> If gcj supplied precise root information to the collector, this would no longer
> matter for gcj.  But that hasn't happened yet, and has some negative consequences.

Jeff had posted something like this earlier, but
it didn't get anywhere AFAICT:



Ranjit Mathew          Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com

Bangalore, INDIA.      Web: http://ranjitmathew.tripod.com/

More information about the Java mailing list