gcj executable size reduction?
Fri Apr 16 05:21:00 GMT 2004
Boehm, Hans wrote:
> If gcj supplied precise root information to the collector, this would no longer
> matter for gcj. But that hasn't happened yet, and has some negative consequences.
Jeff had posted something like this earlier, but
it didn't get anywhere AFAICT:
Ranjit Mathew Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com
Bangalore, INDIA. Web: http://ranjitmathew.tripod.com/
More information about the Java