Mohan (this-is-cool) 's snapshot gcc33-20030409
Mon May 12 10:46:00 GMT 2003
erik poupaert wrote:
>>What not use "fastjar" for "jar" instead of "zip". Its the official
>>gcj "jar" replacement.
> You are right.
> To tell you the truth, I didn't know there was a thing like fastjar. I
> would download it immediately, if it weren't for the fact that
> sourceforge is "dead for maintenance" right now.
If you've check out gcc using CVS, you have fastjar.
Ignore the SourceForge version - I don't think it has been
maintainer for a long time. (Though the one in our sources
could also use some work, at least it handles the basics.)
More information about the Java