Problems with Mohans GCJ 20030522 build

Andrew Haley aph@redhat.com
Tue Jun 3 12:49:00 GMT 2003


Ranjit Mathew writes:
 > >  > I have discussed this with Mohan, but we haven't figured out
 > >  > why GCJ as of >20030409 must have thisiscool-gcc\gcc-3.3\bin
 > >  > in the path.
 > >  > 
 > >  > - gcj fails if it is not in the path
 > >  > 
 > >  >       [apply] com/cyviz/xyzmodem/Upload.java:164: warning: unreachable
 > >  > bytecode from 221 to before 224
 > >  >        [apply] gcj.exe: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No such
 > >  > file or directory
 > > 
 > > Where is `as' installed on your system?  It shouldn't be in gcc-3.3\bin.
 > 
 > Ummm...why do you say so? I've had binutils in the same "prefix"
 > as GCC for quite some time now and it hasn't given me any problems
 > as such.

It's just weird, that's all.  Unless you have a nonstandard `as', I'd
expect to find it in the main bin directory.  I'd also expect the
gcc-x.x dirs to contain the installed gcc bin tree.  The reason for
this is so that when you reinstall gcc you can blow away the whole
gcc-bin directory first, so that there's no cruft left behind.  But of
course everyone is free to install things anywhere they wish.

Andrew.



More information about the Java mailing list