static gcj ant

Dhek Bhun Kho bhun@chello.nl
Thu Jan 16 20:42:00 GMT 2003


Op do 16-01-2003, om 20:49 schreef Tom Tromey:
> >> Well in the end I found GCJ more useable than it seemed at first, the
> >> trick was 1) to circumvent java class bytecodes at all costs
> Why?
The errors I reported earlier when I just started to use gcj were caused
by compiling the java sources to classes and from the classes to
objects. If you can remember it, things like the nested try {} catch {}
blocks and local variables that seem to 'get lost'. I can rerun the
whole compilation to use bytecodes produced from gcj if you'd like. I
just can't guarantee I will be able to submit the PR's real soon.

> I don't remember hearing about MessageFormat bugs.
> Could you submit PRs for them?
Sure. I haven't been able to pinpoint the problem the last time (didn't
debug), but I am planning on recompiling the whole lot and see what kind
of errors occur.

> -- 
> Dhek Bhun Kho <bhun@chello.nl>



More information about the Java mailing list