gcj mingw32 and java memory footprint.

Jeff Sturm jsturm@one-point.com
Wed Feb 19 03:09:00 GMT 2003


On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Boehm, Hans wrote:
> - I think someone was working on explicitly letting the GC know about
> statically allocated pointer variables, so it no longer has to scan
> static data segments.  This allows the collector to operate with the
> same performance and a smaller heap.

Are you talking about http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2002-06/msg00252.html?

I'd still be interested in seeing something like this for gcj, but got
zero feedback from the list the last time I mentioned it.

Jeff



More information about the Java mailing list