Demangling of method names and addr2line/c++filt
Thu Feb 13 11:16:00 GMT 2003
Ranjit Mathew writes:
> > Surely the question is should c++filt work when passed the output of
> > addr2line?
> Considering that the hapless "c++filt" is supposed to work when passed
> the output of *either* "nm" (raw names) or "addr2line" (stripped-of-
> leading-underscore names), IMHO you must help it out a little by passing
> it a "-n" to indicate an addr2line output.
Perhaps so. I can't help feeling, however, that there is a
non-negligible probability that this will break some other platforms.
Perhaps the "-n" could be a configurable option. That would make me
happier with the proposal.
More information about the Java