Status page

[Andrew Haley]

Jeff Sturm writes:
 > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Andreas Tobler wrote:
 > > > IMO, only ports that catch null pointer exceptions in our testcases
 > > > and have a working class loader can be described as "OK" without
 > > > further qualification.  I suggest gcj on Irix be described as "works,
 > > > but unfinished" on the status page.
 > >
 > > How do we call the darwin port? Nearly ready? Soon ready?
 > 
 > Darwin needs threads.  Surely it isn't very useful without threads.

True, but I would have expected more test failures with no threads at
all.

Andrew.