gcj's IO performance vs blackdown JDK
Mohan Embar
gnustuff@thisiscool.com
Sat Dec 27 20:10:00 GMT 2003
Hi Andrew,
>Try this instead it should give you even more.
Here is the output from three successive runs of the "old" version
vs. yours, with the JDK output included each time for reference.
I think the timings are essentially the same, but your version could
be slightly faster....
-- Mohan
http://www.thisiscool.com/
http://www.animalsong.org/
1. pos <= i < limit
-------------------------8<-------------------------
jint java::io::BufferedReader::lineEnd (jint limit)
{
jchar *pbuf = elements (buffer);
int i = pos;
for (; i < limit; i++)
{
jchar ch = pbuf[i];
if (ch == '\n' || ch == '\r')
break;
}
return i;
}
-------------------------8<-------------------------
GCJ (1) JRE
--------- ---------
user 0m14.506s 0m15.549s
user 0m14.531s 0m15.584s
user 0m14.527s 0m15.566s
2. 0 <= i < limit - pos
-------------------------8<-------------------------
jint java::io::BufferedReader::lineEnd (jint limit)
{
jchar *pbuf = elements (buffer) + pos;
int i = 0;
limit -= pos;
for (; i < limit; i++)
{
jchar ch = pbuf[i];
if (ch == '\n' || ch == '\r')
break;
}
return i+pos;
}
-------------------------8<-------------------------
GCJ (2) JRE
--------- ---------
user 0m14.508s 0m15.645s
user 0m14.479s 0m15.637s
user 0m14.545s 0m15.574s
More information about the Java
mailing list