Serialisation bug with abstract classes
Mon Dec 22 16:42:00 GMT 2003
> It was broken before too, otherwise I would have never thought tp dp
> some work on it.
OK, it's completely fine then.
> The reason to this not at once is to understand the
> code more that gets changed and why. Well its CVS HEAD. ITs known to
> cause problems. Nobody really expects it to work 100% always. Its for
Agreed. It's still better to avoid *knowingly* breaking it when you can,
The Nice programming language: http://nice.sf.net
More information about the Java