Serialisation bug with abstract classes

Daniel Bonniot
Mon Dec 22 16:42:00 GMT 2003

 > It was broken before too, otherwise I would have never thought tp dp
 > some work on it.

OK, it's completely fine then.

 > The reason to this not at once is to understand the
 > code more that gets changed and why. Well its CVS HEAD. ITs known to
 > cause problems. Nobody really expects it to work 100% always. Its for
 > development.

Agreed. It's still better to avoid *knowingly* breaking it when you can, 
isn't it?



The Nice programming language:

More information about the Java mailing list