GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited

[Michael Koch]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 06:18:39PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> | >>>>> "Gerald" == Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> writes:
> | 
> | Gerald> The c++ headers are now nicely versioned, in c++/3.4/, but the java
> | Gerald> headers still are put directly into $PREFIX.  How about doing something
> | Gerald> like java/3.4 or gcj/3.4 in parallel to c++?
> | 
> | Gerald> And do we really need ffi.h and jvmpi.h there?
> | 
> | While talking with a couple folks about this on irc, I realized I
> | don't understand why we don't change the layout a bit to get versioned
> | headers for everything all at once.
> | 
> | I.e., instead of $(includedir)/c++/$(version), $(includedir)/gcj/$(version),
> | etc, why not make $(includedir)/$(version)/ as the base, and then
> | install headers directly under that?
> 
> you probably want $(includedir)/GCC-$(version)/
>                                 ^^^^

What about lowercase:

$(includedir)/gcc-$(version)/

I think thats more natural.



Michael