bad libjava/libltdl/Makefile.in; automake version?
Thu Dec 18 16:55:00 GMT 2003
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:42:14PM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> Per Bothner wrote:
> >The version of libjava/libltdl/Makefile.in in the CVS repository
> >does not have the @MAINTAINER_MODE_TRUE@ guard to disable the
> >dependencies when --disable-maintainer-mode (the default) is
> >configured. So it tries to run automake, which fails because
> >it doesn't find the right version of automake.
> >This looks like a serious bug in automake version 1.7.9.
> >(libjava/Makefile.in was generated using automake 1.4, which
> >seems awfully old. This is strange, because both were checked
> >in by Micahel Koch, though not on the same day.)
> Would this one be ok?
> Index: libltdl/acinclude.m4
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/libjava/libltdl/acinclude.m4,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 acinclude.m4
> --- libltdl/acinclude.m4 16 Dec 2003 21:48:24 -0000 1.4
> +++ libltdl/acinclude.m4 18 Dec 2003 15:37:42 -0000
> @@ -163,6 +163,8 @@
> AC_CHECK_TOOL(RANLIB, ranlib, :)
> AC_CHECK_TOOL(STRIP, strip, :)
> Regenration of the files can be done with automake >= 1.6.3 and autoconf
> >= 2.57.
> I tested it here localy, but I'm on automake 1.8. It would be great if
> anyone with an older non infected system could test this one :)
> I'm willing to regenerate the files with automake 1.6.3 and
> autoconf-2.57 if the above patchlet cures the situation.
I think this would be a step backword, we should at least use a automake
1.7.x version (if not 1.8.0)
More information about the Java