Tom Tromey writes: > >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <email@example.com> writes: > > Andrew> Good. Yes, "lib:" it is. I mean, we're never going to link > Andrew> dynamically with a static lib, so the "dynamic" and "shared" bit is > Andrew> irrelevant. > > What do you think of "gcjlib:", to emphasize the gcj-ness of it? > "lib" seems a bit generic. True, true. Andrew.