gcj and jikes
Fri Apr 25 21:34:00 GMT 2003
>>>>> "Erik" == Erik Poupaert <email@example.com> writes:
Erik> If I understand this right, making it easier on people or
Erik> otherwise more attractive to contribute would go a long way in
Erik> solving outstanding technical issues. In such case the point w/r
Erik> to integrating with Jikes, would probably be moot anyway.
Sure, but this would probably require rewriting most of parse.y to
start with. The parser itself is ok (not perfect, but good); the
analysis phases are less than ok. The data structures used in the
analysis are fairly opaque, at least in my opinion.
Erik> By the way, does anybody know how Mauve testscripts are supposed
Erik> to be written? I've looked at several, and they all look
Erik> different. Is there some kind of standard?
You mean formatting-wise? Nope, no standard.
More information about the Java