What's Left for MingW 3.3
Mohan Embar
gnustuff@thisiscool.com
Mon Apr 14 14:05:00 GMT 2003
Hi Andrew,
> > - I don't think the logic for java.nio is correct on Linux either, even though
> > the code happens to work
>
>The lack of a call to elements(), you mean?
I'm sorry. We're trying to talk about 3-4 different things at once and I'm not
helping much trying to keep things straight. From now on, I'll refer to specific
item numbers on my original list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2003-04/msg00166.html
The lack of the elements() call was item #2 on my original list, for which
I have a patch which I think you can commit with a peaceful conscience.
What I meant by the logic in java.nio not being correct refers to item #1
on my original list.
...which refers to this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q1/msg00670.html
Unfortunately, the patch consists of two unrelated pieces which in my patch,
I #ifdef-ed out. Michael later pointed out that for the gnu/java/nio/natSelectorImpl.cc
portion of this patch, I should really implement a dummy _Jv_select() in win32.h
instead of #ifdef-ing out stuff in natSelectorImpl.cc. So I set out to do
this, but then I figured that since select() is also implemented on Win32,
I could just go ahead and try to do the real thing, which opened up a
can of worms and leads me to believe that the current logic is faulty, even
though the code works on Linux:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2003-04/msg00185.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2003-04/msg00187.html
P.S. I really appreciate the time you're taking to work through
this stuff with me....
-- Mohan
http://www.thisiscool.com/
http://www.animalsong.org/
More information about the Java
mailing list