ZipInputStream brokenness

[Per Bothner]

Jeff Sturm wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Per Bothner wrote:
> 
>>Besides, I don't see any reason that you'd ever want to *not* buffer,
>>at least when using a FileInputStream,.
> 
> Perhaps in bulk data copies?  I'd guess a raw InputStream should
> perform slightly better than any buffered stream for large enough reads.

That's application-levell buffering, I think.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/per/