Array_3 execution failure on sparc-linux (sun4m/sparc32) in gcc 3.2 branch 20021008

Andrew Haley aph@redhat.com
Wed Oct 9 08:35:00 GMT 2002


=?iso-8859-1?Q?Christian=5FJ=F6nsson?= writes:
 > On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 04:11:48PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
 > > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Christian=5FJ=F6nsson?= writes:
 > >  > Just as a litte freshen up, is the Array_3 issues still what to expect?
 > > 
 > > You'll get a failure on Array_3 until MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR is
 > > implemented on that platform.
 > > 
 > 
 > thanks for your reply. where would that be implemented?

Hey, I looked and you've already got one!  David Miller
<davem@redhat.com> added it in April.

So, there is no good reason why Array_3 should be fileing with the
current source.

Andrew.



More information about the Java mailing list