patch to enable inet_addr() on Win32 [ok for mainline?]
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Tue May 28 10:02:00 GMT 2002
--On Tuesday, May 28, 2002 09:55:59 AM -0700 Adam Megacz
<gcj@lists.megacz.com> wrote:
>
> Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
>> > So you'll approve these changes for the branch?
>
>> I'd like you (and them) to keep going, though; recognize that you've
>> papered over a problem and figure out how to fix the problem for real.
>
> Sorry, I wasn't being clear enough -- by "these changes", I meant
> fixing the configury's assumption that crosscompile implies newlib
> target. I was asking if that fix (which would be substantial) would
> qualify as small/safe enough for the branch.
Good question. I don't know -- it'll depend on what comes out of that.
If it's too complex, it's perfectly reasonable to use your original
patch on the branch and the new patch on the mainline. I don't mind
ugly hacks on the branch; sometimes that's the best way to fix a
specific problem with minimal risk. On the mainline, though, ugly
hacks confuse us for years to come.
I'm sorry not to have a definitive answer for you.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the Java
mailing list