java aliasing rules
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Fri Mar 29 16:26:00 GMT 2002
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 11:22:28AM +1200, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> The second increment of ps1.f1 should not be allowed to be
> moved/combined ahead of the first "ps2.f2++", because it can trap/throw.
Hum. That's ugly. The scheduling problem can be handled
easily. Fixing global optimizations without practically
disabling them is harder.
> [ check it in to mainline anyway ]
> What do you guys think?
Sounds good.
r~
More information about the Java
mailing list