java aliasing rules

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Fri Mar 29 16:26:00 GMT 2002


On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 11:22:28AM +1200, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> The second increment of ps1.f1 should not be allowed to be 
> moved/combined ahead of the first "ps2.f2++", because it can trap/throw. 

Hum.  That's ugly.  The scheduling problem can be handled
easily.  Fixing global optimizations without practically
disabling them is harder.

> [ check it in to mainline anyway ]
> What do you guys think?

Sounds good.


r~



More information about the Java mailing list