Solaris 2.8 build

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On 15 Mar 2002, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Second, if so, then doesn't that imply that the 2.8 problem is fixed?
> (If you've got some time, would you mind testing this?  If you can't,
> tell me, and I'll see if I can do it.)

I tried bootstrapping mainline with --enable-libgcj and an already
existing installed tree at --prefix, but failed due to an unrelated
failure: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-03/msg00925.html>

I'll try the 3.1-branch ASAP, but to make sure, is this the test you
had in mind?

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/