Deja Vu: multiple definition of `java::lang::String::length()'?

[Bryce McKinlay]

Adam Megacz wrote:

>Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
>
>>gcjh needs a major overhaul.  Unfortunately it is very low priority.
>>
>
>Is there any reason it can't be rewritten in Java?
>

Bootstrapping: ie can't run gcjh without a Java runtime, but can't build 
the runtime without gcjh. Unless we want to assume that there is already 
an existing javac/java or a working gcj, but I'm not sure we're ready to 
make that assumption yet.

Of course, when the front end gets rewritten in Java then there won't be 
a reason why gcjh can't be as well ;-)

regards

Bryce.