gcj-mingw is ready for inclusion in gcc 3.1

[Bryce McKinlay]

Tom Tromey wrote:

>>>>>>"Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:
>>>>>>
>
>Bryce> I want to add a compiler option which tells it that a given
>Bryce> class/package/everything will end up in the same binary object.
>
>Could we just use --assume-compiled?
>It seems to me that these two ideas are pretty similar.
>Plus, --assume-compiled has never really worked anyway.
>

Well, I thought --no-assume-compiled would mean weak linking, ie 
Class.forName stubs for class references, no symbol references to other 
classes at all, meaning native code could be linked against class files. 
The binary compatibility stuff I have been working on doesn't go that far.

regards

Bryce.