CNI doc question
Tony Knaus
awk@spinnakernet.com
Tue Jan 29 08:20:00 GMT 2002
Bryce McKinlay wrote:
>
> Jeff Sturm wrote:
>
> >Wow, that's old. G++ and gcj both use the new ABI on all targets since
> >the 3.0 release. The -fvtable-thunks flag no longer has any effect,
> >though AFAIK -fno-rtti is still required for CNI sources.
> >
>
> Hmm, I never use -fno-rtti and I havn't noticed any problems ;-)
>
So is -fno-rtti required or not? I'm not using it and I haven't
noticed a problem either. Out of curiosity what is the conflict
between gcj and G++ rtti?
Thanks,
-tony
More information about the Java
mailing list