CNI doc question

Tony Knaus awk@spinnakernet.com
Tue Jan 29 08:20:00 GMT 2002


Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> 
> Jeff Sturm wrote:
> 
> >Wow, that's old.  G++ and gcj both use the new ABI on all targets since
> >the 3.0 release.  The -fvtable-thunks flag no longer has any effect,
> >though AFAIK -fno-rtti is still required for CNI sources.
> >
> 
> Hmm, I never use -fno-rtti and I havn't noticed any problems ;-)
> 

So is -fno-rtti required or not? I'm not using it and I haven't
noticed a problem either. Out of curiosity what is the conflict
between gcj and G++ rtti?

Thanks,

-tony



More information about the Java mailing list