Speaking of runtime options
Mon Jan 28 16:01:00 GMT 2002
>>>>> "Hans" == Boehm, Hans <email@example.com> writes:
Hans> Probably the most compatible solution is to ignore -Xmx, perhaps
Hans> after issuing a warning, and keep the gij heap limit option
Hans> distinct. I think -ms and -Xms have similar semantics.
It seems to me that this is something we ought to push into the GC
interface. At least one group out there has written their own GC for
use with libgcj. Alternate GCs could conceivably want to make their
own decisions regarding this policy.
More information about the Java