nogc.cc & darwin
Fri Jan 25 13:09:00 GMT 2002
Andrew Haley wrote:
>Bryce McKinlay writes:
> > I think we should really be using the libc implementations of these
> > functions since they are faster (written in assembly). We should only
> > use the fdlibm math functions for targets that don't have a math library
> > (and possibly also for StrictMath?)
>Probably, but until we have a proper implementation of strictfp we're
>better off with what we've got. At least we're compatible with one
>Java math library standard...
AFAIK "strictfp" doesn't have anything to do with the Math.* calls,
though. You'd still have to call StrictMath.x() if you wanted the strict
implementation even if your method/class was declared strictfp.
More information about the Java