Bug on Solaris

Andrew Haley aph@cambridge.redhat.com
Tue Jan 8 06:49:00 GMT 2002

Martin Kahlert writes:
 > Hi Andrew,
 > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 02:26:37PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
 > > Andrew Haley writes:
 > >  > It looks to me like the Java source compiler is miscompiling your test
 > >  > case.  java.lang.Double looks fine.
 > >  > 
 > >  > The first thing I'd try is recompiling gcj with no optimizations.  Go
 > >  > into gcc/gcc and do make clean; make; make install.
 > >  > 
 > >  > Andrew.
 > > 
 > > P.S.  I take it that the Linux gcj and the Solaris gcj have been built
 > > from exactly the same source.
 > Nearly ;-)
 > Of course, they use the same java-source file hello.java.
 > The 'linux-c' linux version was from snapshot gcc-20020107.
 > I now use gcc-20011231 on Linux, too, and the resulting disassambly
 > of hello.java is *exactly* the same as the one i gave to you produced by
 > gcc-20020107.
 > Now, the two gcc-20011231 sources differ by a patch from Richard Henderson
 > which was applied on Solaris to survive an assembler error. (IIRC,
 > it is in mainline now an it is also in gcc-20020107).

Well, you really will have to compile the exact same gcj for both
platforms, preferably without any optimization, before we go any futher.

I don't think the reorg.c patch will make any difference to gcj -C.


More information about the Java mailing list