New gcj option --no-store-check

Bryce McKinlay
Thu Feb 28 16:13:00 GMT 2002

Jeff Sturm wrote:

>I'd say this merits a news item, does anyone agree?  I tried it on my
>interpreter benchmark, and got around a 5% boost on code that's
>usually dominated by GC time.

I'll post one shortly.

>Also, will this go into 3.1?

Yep, its already on the 3.1 branch.



More information about the Java mailing list