[freenet-tech] Technology / Features

Adam Megacz gcj@lists.megacz.com
Mon Feb 25 23:45:00 GMT 2002

Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> writes:
> but libgcj is still missing some of the provider/implementation
> gnu.java.security.* classes/packages.

Ah, that would explain why lots of stuff didn't work.

  - a

"If I put copyrighted material into the 'chewy nougat center', I can
 claim the crunchy chocolate coating is an 'Access Control
 Mechanism'."                                     --lynx_user_abroad

Why Windows NT/2k/XP is unreliable: www.zappadoodle.com

More information about the Java mailing list