who's been mucking with EXEEXT?
Tom Tromey
tromey@redhat.com
Fri Aug 30 15:39:00 GMT 2002
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
Jeff> Hmm... I agree that is wrong, but I don't see how it could've
Jeff> broken recently:
Back when this code was written, I think the gcc build added `.exe'
suffixes based on the target and not the host. This was incorrect,
and I don't remember why it wasn't changed, but we just accommodated
that. Perhaps that has changed in the meantime.
Jeff> Anyway, am I incorrect saying that gcjh is a host utility but
Jeff> EXEEXT is a target setting?
You're not incorrect.
Jeff> 2002-08-27 Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com>
Jeff> * Makefile.am (ZIP, GCJH): Remove $(EXEEXT).
Looks good to me. I set up a mingw build today. I'll test this and
if it works for linux native and linux-x-mingw I will check it in.
Now that I have plenty of disk space again, I'm just going to leave my
mingw build around so I can test it from time to time.
Tom
More information about the Java
mailing list