change of libgcj soname for gcc-3.2?

[Jeff Sturm]

On 12 Aug 2002, Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> Jeff> Anyone besides me think --indirect-dispatch should be on by
> Jeff> default?  (Once the interpreter is fixed, that is.)
>
> I'm currently (I reserve the right to be swayed by as-yet-unmade
> arguments :-) in favor of it, once the missing parts have been
> implemented.  I like the idea significantly reducing our ABI
> compatibility worries, especially since we'll be changing the library
> in every forseeable future release.

I submitted a PR for this so we don't forget about it.  I suppose the
earlist we can consider it is for 3.4.

Jeff