UTF-16 not supported?

[Adrian Bunk]

On 16 Aug 2002, Tom Tromey wrote:

>...
> Does anybody out there have a box with glibc 2.1.3?  I'd like to know
> if you could run a test to see how this behaves there.
>
> How common is 2.1.3?  Is there a distribution still using it?  (Even a
> somewhat old distribution, if it is still in common use.)  If it is
> really obsolete then I can just remove all pretense at a workaround...

Debian 2.2 was using 2.1.3 and Debian 3.0 is only one month old, so there
are still many installations of Debian 2.2.

OTOH considering that the use of gcj is AFAIK not so widespread I'm not
sure whether it's worth the effort staying compatible with older versions
of glibc.

> Tom

cu
Adrian

-- 

You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of
time explaining its a free country because its a police state.
								Alan Cox