walking the stack

[Bryce McKinlay]

Adam Megacz wrote:

>Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:
>
>>>Is there any way to get line numbers this way, or would the stack
>>>trace be limited to class/method names?
>>>
>>No, there would be no way to get line number info from a stripped binary 
>>- it would just be class/method names.
>>
>
>So would it make sense to have a three stage fallback here
>(DWARF2->addr2line()->reflection_data)?
>

Yeah - although ideally we'd be able to get rid of addr2line alltogether 
if we can do dwarf2. It would also be good to have some way to recognise 
interpreter/JIT frames and call into them for their own stack info.

regards

Bryce.