Java test failures

Mark Mitchell
Thu May 3 16:47:00 GMT 2001

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <> writes:

    Tom> I agree, and we've already decided on and implemented a
    Tom> policy of 0 FAIL for libgcj.  We also work to reduce the
    Tom> XPASS count as much as possible (sometimes it isn't easily
    Tom> doable to make the XPASS count always be 0).  The nicest
    Tom> thing about 0 FAIL is that you immediately know if something
    Tom> has gone wrong.

Great; we're totally on the same page. 

I look forward to the patch.

Mark Mitchell         
CodeSourcery, LLC     

More information about the Java mailing list