Java test failures
Thu May 3 16:47:00 GMT 2001
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <email@example.com> writes:
Tom> I agree, and we've already decided on and implemented a
Tom> policy of 0 FAIL for libgcj. We also work to reduce the
Tom> XPASS count as much as possible (sometimes it isn't easily
Tom> doable to make the XPASS count always be 0). The nicest
Tom> thing about 0 FAIL is that you immediately know if something
Tom> has gone wrong.
Great; we're totally on the same page.
I look forward to the patch.
Mark Mitchell firstname.lastname@example.org
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the Java