Gcj 3.0 on Itanium, again

Jeff Sturm jsturm@one-point.com
Mon Jun 25 10:24:00 GMT 2001


On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Andrew Haley wrote:
> But gcj defaults to -g1.  This is a nuisance...

"for javac compatibility", as the comment says.  That's reasonable IMO
since we want backtraces to work.

I wouldn't oppose bumping this to -g2 for the next release, but I'm really
hoping c++/2814 will be fixed.  I'll test its regression status, and
lobby for a high priority.

Jeff




More information about the Java mailing list