servlet code

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:

Per> However, having the extensions packages separate means having to
Per> resolve the library search rules.  I.e. does the programmer need
Per> to specify explicit CLASSPATH (when compiling) or -l (when
Per> linking) to get the extension library?  This is a somewhat
Per> controversial issue.

What is the controversy again?

I think when searching for .class files we ought to follow whatever
javac does.  javac compatibility is a longstanding goal, and I think
it is a reasonable one.

Tom