Does -fjni work with recent builds?

Barnet Wagman wagman@enteract.com
Fri Jan 19 13:53:00 GMT 2001


 
Alexandre Petit-Bianco wrote:
Barnet Wagman writes:
> gcj -fjni -c Locfit.java
> /tmp/ccwnIIQ4.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/ccwnIIQ4.s:1546: Error: Ignoring attempt to re-define symbol
> /tmp/ccwnIIQ4.s:1546: Error: Rest of line ignored. First ignored
> character is `,'.
You need to either provide us with a test case, or maybe the actual
line gas doesn't like.
Thanks.
./A
Here's an example:


public class JniTest {
    public native void jni_test();
    public static native void jniSetup();
    static {
        System.loadLibrary("locfit");
        jniSetup();
    }
    public JniTest() {}
}


Without the -fjni switch gcj (version 2.97 20010117) compiles it without
complaint.  With -fjni
bash-2.03$ gcj -fjni -c JniTest.java
/tmp/ccq7mFeP.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccq7mFeP.s:417: Error: Ignoring attempt to re-define symbol
/tmp/ccq7mFeP.s:417: Error: Rest of line ignored. First ignored
character is `,'.
( FYI my assembler is GNU assembler version 2.10.91 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
using BFD version 2.10.91  I'm running Linux 2.2.14
(SuSE 6.4), ix86 hardware.)
As far as I know, the 'static native' declaration is legitimate.  
It works with a various jvms.
Regards,
Barnet
 



More information about the Java mailing list