Args list too long
Bryce McKinlay
bryce@albatross.co.nz
Thu Jan 11 16:04:00 GMT 2001
Jeff Sturm wrote:
> > Offhand I don't know a great solution. One fix might be to have
> > libjava/Makefile create a bunch of smaller shared libraries which are
> > then linked together to form libgcj.so.
>
> You don't want to do that with shared libraries. Instead you might collapse
> groups of objects into a single object, maybe at the package level. Then the
> final link command will combine perhaps dozens of objects instead of hundreds.
> (Similar to how the Linux kernel builds.)
>
> This strategy would benefit libjava maintainers as well. On one of my hosts I
> have to wait several minutes just for the final link to complete, even if only a
> single object has changed. That's not much fun while doing rapid
> edit/build/debug cycles.
One of my ideas for "future gcj" is that it should be able to treat an entire
package as a single compilation unit and generate a single object file from it.
This would also have the benefit of making certain optimizations easier, like
inlining of package-private methods. Maybe this would need a lot of memory in same
cases though.
regards
[ bryce ]
More information about the Java
mailing list