do we need separate thread for FirstThread

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:

Per> The last I think is the killer argument, but the other ones are
Per> also worth noting. So what are the arguments in favor of starting
Per> a separate native thread?  Uniform representation for all Java
Per> threads?  But we have to treat FirstThread special anyway, at
Per> least when we start it up.

I've been planning to make this change whenever I get around to it.
The idea is to write a "CNI Invocation API" and then rewrite the JNI
Invocation API on top of it.

Tom