[patch] java run-time stack trace
Thu Feb 8 08:31:00 GMT 2001
Per Bothner writes:
> Bryce McKinlay <email@example.com> writes:
> > Actually, I'd like to have CNI functions mangled in C++ style. This is
> > how they are written in the source code (think copy/search/paste), and it
> > can help to make it very obvious when the stack trace goes through native
> > code. Also, this is consistent with GDB.
> What about library functions? Having (say) ClassLoader.defineClass
> should up in C++ style is *not* what most users want or expect.
> Whether a class is written in Java or CNI is an implementation detail,
> which should not effect how the stack trace looks, at least for standard
> java.* and javax.* classes.
I'm sure this is right. What bothers me is how java demangling can
possibly cope with things like array<int>.
More information about the Java