[patch] java run-time stack trace

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:

Per> This patch accomplishes that.  It does have the undesirable
Per> side-effect that C or C++ functions are are written Java-style
Per> (i.e no * or ::):
Per> but I think that is reasonable enough for a Java stack printer.

I agree.

Per> Any objections to checking this in (now, before the branch)?

I think it is fine: it is low risk, correct, useful, etc.
c++filt is part of gcc so I don't think there is any danger with
version skew.

Per> I believe glibc includes a demangler.  It would be better to use
Per> that when available but that requires some configury magic.

Could you add a PR for this?

Tom