.java to binary compilation problem

[Per Bothner]

Jeff Sturm <jsturm@sigma6.com> writes:

> I'm confused.  "Context" is a class name, not a package.  The
> fully-qualified name is "spec.harness.Context".  I don't understand why
> the package naming rules are relevant.

Sorry, for some reason I thought it was a package name.

I am not happy with the way name resolution is handled in Gcj.
The most obvious problem is that the data structures (tree nodes)
do not follow normal tree node structure.  That in turn makes
it difficult to understand the code - I never did.  I really
would like to see this code get re-written.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/~per/