Patches for faster interface dispatch, type checking

[Per Bothner]

Godmar Back <gback@cs.utah.edu> writes:

> Not being able to handle java.lang.Object is maybe not top-critical,
> but it's important in that it currently prevents gcj from executing valid
> bytecode other JVMs do execute.  (I.e., bytecode you may find in a binary
> distribution of a software package.)

I'm guessing this is tied in with previous discussins, but I think
it would help if you explained again what is needed to "handle Object".
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/~per/