[Bug java/5537] Error compiling simple bytecode with jsr

[rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-02 07:54 -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> What's the take on this bug? Can indirect-dispatch be made the default in the
> foreseable future? Can the old verifier be fixed?
> 
> I'm now running nightly builds of gcj on the Nice compiler testsuite (1250
> testcases). There are currently 11 failures, and 4 seem to be instances of this
> verifier bug. So fixing this would be a great improvement.

See:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00568.html

which makes even the non-indirect-dispatch case use the new
shiny verifier.

It definitely fixes this PR and a whole lot of other verifier
bugs. Can you test it with your application too? (Thanks in
advance for doing it.)

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5537