[Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Feb 16 18:26:00 GMT 2005
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 04:55 -------
The Process_* failure should be fixed by:
2005-02-15 David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com>
* prims.cc (_Jv_CreateJavaVM): Add comment about initialization order.
* posix-threads.cc (_Jv_InitThreads): Call block_sigchld() here to
ensure that GC threads inherit the new signal mask.
(block_sigchld): Call JvFail rather than throwing exception if
pthread_sigmask() fails.
But since none of us have solaris we could not test it.
The following thread is where this patch comes from:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00415.html
So which testcases are regressions now (well just to make sure that I don't make a mistake when the
next one gets fixed)?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
More information about the Java-prs
mailing list