[Bug libgcj/10353] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Java testsuite failures

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Feb 16 18:26:00 GMT 2005


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-16 04:55 -------
The Process_* failure should be fixed by:
	2005-02-15  David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
	Bryce McKinlay  <mckinlay@redhat.com>
	
	* prims.cc (_Jv_CreateJavaVM): Add comment about initialization order.
	* posix-threads.cc (_Jv_InitThreads): Call block_sigchld() here to
	ensure that GC threads inherit the new signal mask.
	(block_sigchld): Call JvFail rather than throwing exception if
	pthread_sigmask() fails.

But since none of us have solaris we could not test it.

The following thread is where this patch comes from:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00415.html

So which testcases are regressions now (well just to make sure that I don't make a mistake when the 
next one gets fixed)?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353



More information about the Java-prs mailing list